PropertyRadar does something most of its competitors will not: it puts a complete rate card on a public page, add-on prices included. That deserves credit, and it changes what this guide has to be. There is no hidden number to reveal. The useful work is reading the rate card correctly — because PropertyRadar does not price one thing, it prices three, and buyers routinely pick a plan against the wrong one of them.
Disclosure: Scout Data is our product; treat that section as a maker’s pitch and the rest as our honest read.
Three meters, running at different speeds
Every PropertyRadar plan carries three separate monthly limits, and they do not deplete together:
- Exports. How many records you can pull out of the platform in a month. Generous on every tier.
- Monitored properties. How many properties you can hold under watch for changes. This is the meter that reflects the product’s actual thesis.
- Phones and emails. How many records you can append contact information to. This is the meter that runs out first for anyone doing outbound.
The gap between the first and third is the part worth staring at. On the Solo plan, as publicly advertised at the time of writing, the export allowance is 10,000 records a month and the phones-and-emails allowance is 250. You can take forty records out of the platform for every one you are allowed to append a phone number to. That ratio is not an accident or a trap — it tells you exactly who the product was designed for. It was designed for someone who researches a lot and dials a little.
The published rate card
| Plan | Monthly / annual | Users | Exports | Monitored | Phones & emails |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solo | $119 / $99 | 1 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 250 |
| Team | $249 / $199 | 3 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 500 |
| Business | $599 / $549 | 10 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 2,500 |
The advertised add-on rates sit alongside those plans: additional users at $50 per user per month, phone numbers and email addresses at 8¢ per contact, relatives at 20¢, extra exports at 2¢ per record, email sends at 2¢, document images at $4. Team and Business are advertised with add-on discounts of 25% and 50% respectively, which matters more than the headline plan price for anyone who will live in the add-ons.
Every figure on this page is what PropertyRadar publicly advertised on its own pricing page at the time of writing. Rate cards move — confirm current pricing with PropertyRadar directly, and with our sales team for Scout Data.
The arithmetic that decides your bill
Take a small outbound operation that wants 5,000 dialable homeowner records a month. On Solo, 250 of those contacts are included and 4,750 are billed at 8¢, which is $380 of append on top of a $119 subscription — the add-on is three times the plan. Move to Business, where the allowance is 2,500 and the advertised add-on discount is 50%, and the same 5,000 records look very different: the plan costs more and the marginal contact costs less. Which is cheaper depends entirely on whether you cross the allowance, and by how much.
That is the whole trick to buying this product well. Do not pick a plan by comparing subscription prices. Estimate the number of contacts you will append in a month, then compute plan price plus overage at the discounted add-on rate for each of the three tiers, and pick the lowest total. Most buyers do the first calculation and never do the second.
And convert whatever total you land on into the number that actually predicts cost per booked appointment: not cost per contact, but cost per dialable contact — total spend divided by the records that came back with a working number for the right person. The formula and a worksheet are in our skip tracing cost calculator, and skip tracing accuracy covers why an append at 8¢ and an append at 15¢ can invert once the match is scored against a dialer.
What you are actually paying for: monitoring
Strip the append economics away and PropertyRadar’s real product is the monitoring meter. Its heritage is foreclosure tracking — watching a set of properties and reporting what changed — and the modern platform is the same idea widened: hold a list, get told when a sale records, a loan changes, an owner moves. For a broker, an investor, or a lender working a defined farm area, that is a genuinely valuable subscription and the allowance is priced sensibly against it.
It is worth being clear about what monitoring does and does not cover, though, because the word suggests more than it delivers for home services. It watches records that get recorded — transactions, loans, ownership. It does not watch the physical world. A roof does not record anything when it ages past replacement, a hailstorm does not file a document, and a solar permit pulled by an installer who has since stopped trading shows up in permit data, not in the transaction record. Different signal class, different product.
When this rate card stops fitting
There is a volume above which per-contact append pricing stops being a rate and starts being a tax. A floor appending 30,000 records a month at 8¢ is spending $2,400 on append against a $599 plan, and every one of those contacts is billed on submission rather than on whether it came back usable. At that point the subscription is a rounding error, the append is the product, and you are buying a bulk contact service through a research tool’s billing system.
The three signs you have crossed the line: append spend exceeds the subscription by more than about 2×; you are buying seats for people who never open the platform, only receive its exports; and nobody on the team uses monitoring. Each of those means you are paying for research infrastructure to obtain a delivery outcome, which is the moment to price a per-record source instead. The wider field of options is in PropertyRadar alternatives, and the head-to-head with the other rate-card publisher in this category is PropStream vs PropertyRadar.
Where Scout Data fits
List Builder does not have three meters, because it does not sell research access — it sells the finished list. Homeowner audiences are built from live property signals, shipped with phones matched by name to the owner on title, scrubbed against the federal do-not-call registry before delivery, and dead numbers replaced rather than billed. The same graph is available per record through the API. Pricing is quoted against your monthly record volume, which is the number you were going to have to estimate anyway to read PropertyRadar’s rate card properly.
Frequently asked questions
How much does PropertyRadar cost per month?
At the time of writing PropertyRadar publicly advertises three plans on its pricing page — Solo at $119/month, Team at $249/month and Business at $599/month, each lower when prepaid annually ($99, $199 and $549 respectively). Those are subscription prices, not the whole bill: the contact append that turns a property into something you can dial is metered separately. Confirm current rates with PropertyRadar before budgeting.
Does PropertyRadar include phone numbers?
It includes an allowance, not a supply. Each plan bundles a monthly quantity of phones and emails — 250 on Solo, 500 on Team, 2,500 on Business as publicly advertised — and beyond that allowance contacts are billed per contact. For anything resembling call-center volume, the allowance is a rounding error and the per-contact rate is the real price.
What is a monitored property and why does it have its own limit?
Monitoring is PropertyRadar’s distinguishing feature: you hold a set of properties under watch and get told when something changes on them. That is a standing cost to the vendor rather than a one-time query, which is why it carries its own cap alongside the export cap. It also means the plan you need is decided by how many properties you want to keep watching, not by how many you looked at this month.
Is the annual plan worth it?
Only if your usage is flat. The advertised annual rates are meaningfully lower per month, but they buy a fixed monthly allowance twelve times over. Outbound work is rarely flat — storm season, a new market, a campaign push — and a plan sized to the peak wastes eleven months while a plan sized to the average overflows into per-record fees exactly when volume matters most.